tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2996230650732014604.post256027447677701247..comments2024-03-26T11:18:30.014-04:00Comments on The Conversational Lawyer: You’ve Got Mail: Why Emailgate Ended This WayEric S. Sarnerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10849032956790839583noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2996230650732014604.post-33396428914485130112019-05-13T03:07:56.858-04:002019-05-13T03:07:56.858-04:00Do you have a Youtube channel as well with this ki...Do you have a Youtube channel as well with this kind of content on it? I would love to see this post turned into a longer video if possible. Maybe I can share on it on my website.<br /><a href="https://www.edocr.com/user/lanzonscott" rel="nofollow">Scott Lanzon Knoxville</a><br />Zhou Meisenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16733993795972588534noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2996230650732014604.post-16992936320721899912016-07-12T14:55:28.286-04:002016-07-12T14:55:28.286-04:00Taran: Your point about place of custody is spot o...Taran: Your point about place of custody is spot on, and a good example of how a soon to be 100 year old law does not necessarily fit with our modern cyberworld. It also is no doubt one of the reasons this was not seen as a clear winner. General Petraeus, who ultimately pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge under a different law, 18 U.S.C. §1924, had another very big difference -- he admitted asEric S. Sarnerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10849032956790839583noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2996230650732014604.post-12596175527692120942016-07-12T08:00:26.943-04:002016-07-12T08:00:26.943-04:00Eric, interesting analysis but you left out an imp...Eric, interesting analysis but you left out an important detail: unlike Secretary Clinton, Director Petraeus was charged because he knowingly turned over classified information to a person with whom he was romantically involved and was not entitled to receive or view such classified information. That is a clear violation of 18 U.S.C. §793(f) as he " delivered [classified information] to Taran Grigsbyhttp://www.bradvisors.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2996230650732014604.post-11199766529647573352016-07-11T08:38:17.876-04:002016-07-11T08:38:17.876-04:00So well done, you should submit this to WSJ for in...So well done, you should submit this to WSJ for inclusion in it's OpEd page? shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17987488901679599894noreply@blogger.com